Summary
The Corporate A/G Research Extension is a research-grade application of A/G-style structural decomposition to public SEC company filings. It studies structural distress, joint-collapse severity, and divergence / masking regimes among eligible non-financial operating companies. After a five-cohort validation chain (Phases 15b → 16 → 17 → 18) and a five-track Phase-19 hardening round, the corporate branch is locked as a research artifact.
What it is
- A reproducible firm-year panel built from public SEC EDGAR data only.
- Per-firm-year scores for three risk-up geometries computed from a locked Phase-13 spec.
- An evidence chain from raw data through validation metrics, with documented attenuation as the cohort moves from enriched to realistic.
- An honest record of where the signal survives and where it is matched or beaten by simple primitives.
What it is not
- Not a bankruptcy prediction product.
- Not a credit rating.
- Not investment advice.
- Not a production model, regulatory-grade screen, or automated decision system.
- Not a replacement for credit analysis.
- Not a production risk model or automated decision system.
Main result
Phase-18 full-population pooled metrics on the FY 2019 – FY 2025 test fold (19,410 rows; 231 strict positives; base rate 1.19%):
- Structural distress AUROC 0.711 strict / 0.683 anchored — the strongest A/G composite screen.
- Joint-collapse severity AUROC 0.677 / 0.642 — near-petition severity geometry.
- Divergence / masking AUROC 0.489 / 0.510 — chance for broad Chapter 11 / Item 1.03 distress screening; retained for the divergence regime.
Phase-19 baseline comparison: two single primitives — operating cash flow / assets and interest coverage — slightly outperform the composite on AUROC (0.736 and 0.726 vs 0.711). The composite’s value is robustness and regime separation, not maximum raw discrimination.
Geometry roles
- Structural distress — primary broad screen.
- Joint-collapse severity — near-petition severity / joint deterioration geometry.
- Divergence / masking — diagnostic for the high-A, low-G regime; first internal evidence in Phase 19; not a Ch.11 screen.
Why corporate uses its own geometry
- SEC / XBRL data is heterogeneous (tag variation, restatements, late filings, small-cap shells).
- Chapter 11 / Item 1.03 distress is low base rate (~ 0.5 – 1.0% per year).
- State-vector geometry keeps G and A separate so distinct regimes (joint collapse vs divergence / masking) can be diagnosed rather than averaged out.
- Anchor coverage is imperfect (Item 1.03 8-Ks only).
- Sector heterogeneity is large; pooled metrics hide cell-to-cell variation.
Allowed claims
- "Research-grade preliminary full-population screening evidence."
- "Eligible SEC non-financial operating-company universe under project filters."
- "Ranked monitoring / triage primitive."
- "A/G-style structural decomposition adapted to SEC public-company filings."
- "Research-grade extension subject to SEC/XBRL constraints."
- "Not a bankruptcy prediction product."
- "Canonical R retained for divergence / masking; first internal evidence; external validation pending."
Forbidden claims
- "Predicts bankruptcy."
- "Validated commercial bankruptcy predictor."
- "Production model" / "regulatory-grade."
- "Replaces credit analysis."
- "Investment advice" / "credit rating."
- "Top bankruptcy risks" / "highest-risk companies" / "likely to fail."
- "The A/G composite improves on simple financial primitives" (it does not, on this data).
Final classification
Corporate branch status: LOCKED / research-grade SEC public-company extension / not production / worth preserving.
CORPORATE_FINAL_FREEZE_NOTE.md in the project
repository. The full text records allowed / forbidden
wording in detail and cites the underlying phase notes.
Back to Evidence · Documents index.